No party should exercise any authority over the judicial authority no matter who that party might be. This is to say that the judges should only be dismissed or transferred from their positions in accordance with the law. The Minister of Justice’s overarching legal authorities over the status and work of judges should also be put to an end. Instead, a fully independent body should oversee these processes, and such a body can be no other than the Supreme Judicial Council. In addition, there should be strict requirements that hopeful members of this council should meet, in terms of high competency and good mannerism. Putting an end to the Minister of Justice’s overarching legal authorities over the judiciary should turn the minister into someone who merely implements the decisions of the Supreme Judicial Council.

One of the topics that cannot be raised whenever we speak about wanted political reform or one of the incidents of injustice or exploitation is related to the law and judiciary as well as their position in the political structure of the state. This requires more than being satisfied with theoretical discussion of basic sayings or rules. The most important thing that we need to stress is the independence of the judges and the rule of law, in addition to the need to make a link between this rule and the concept of justice, which is one of the main human values. The supporters of oppression may dare to justify the random decisions to defame the constitution, fire a judge, or even fake a law. However, they cannot speak directly about justification of the deactivation of justice itself. In this case, they work on claiming that they respect them and apply them through these unfair decisions, which affect justice. This confirms the importance of making a link between speaking about respect for the law and the independence of justice, as well as working on achieving them through real and radical political reform based on the axioms of the system of values, especially the values of justice.

Applying the rule of separation of powers has to be achieved hand in hand with solving a basic dilemma by finding a practical way to combine the independence of the judiciary and the priority of the judiciary over the executive and legislative authorities. It also has to ascertain that the legislations are subject to their powers and the legal systems are linked in turn to the enforcement of these legislations.

There should be no interference or influence by others on the procedures, decisions and rules of the judiciary. Interference or influence is rejected, whether it is physical or moral, and whether it is direct or indirect. It is rejected by all means. The executive and the legislative authorities and the men of public and private law are also banned from influencing the judiciary. Among those who are forbidden to influence the judiciary, there are also the administrative presidents of the judges and the parties of the lawsuit. On the other hand, the independence of the judiciary obligates the judges to refuse to respond, accept or submit to any interference or influence. Based on that, judges should never respond or submit to anything except the voice of the law and conscience. The aim of judicial independence and the protection of this independence is to achieve justice, which can never be achieved in the absence of one of its main components, which is the independence of judges and protecting this independence against any interference or influence.

Judges must report to the Supreme Judicial Council all types of interference in their judicial powers, regardless of their origin, especially those of the executive authority. The Supreme Judicial Council has to do what is necessary to go after those who interfere, criminally and administratively. Judges must form an association to defend their financial and moral interests, protect their independence and clean up their side of the offenders. The state must constantly strive to raise the stature of the judiciary and judges, whether at the level of continuous training or through an increase in wages, compensations for judges and the legal recording officers, and in the human and material prospects. The independence and protection of the judiciary includes the independence of judges who make decisions and the judiciary, i.e.the judicial corps, namely the judges who practice their duties in the management of the Ministry of Justice. This is derived from the requirements of the judiciary. The independence of the judiciary and the protection of this independence are justified by the fact that the legal system is concerned with, among other things, and specialized in conducting research in the crimes committed, the report of the follow-up, the delivery of pleadings to the Court and the implementation of the resolutions and the provisions of the latter. If necessary, the independence of the judiciary, in the practice of the mentioned terms of reference, may protect this practice against all types of interference and influence in order to achieve justice, which is reflected, among other things, in no impunity for those who deserve it and in not pursuing or punishing those who do not deserve to be punished and pursued.