Red_arrow

Would you like to make English your default language, on this site? |

Lawsuits against Egyptian actor stir debate about freedom of expression

Adel Imam holds an award for his role in the film 'The Yacoubian Building' in 2007. [Nasser Nuri/Reuters]

Adel Imam holds an award for his role in the film 'The Yacoubian Building' in 2007. [Nasser Nuri/Reuters]

  • COMMENT

    32

  • Print this article
  • increase decrease

Legal cases involving actor Adel Imam, who was recently accused of contempt of religion for the roles he played in several films, are triggering intense debate in Cairo.

The Agouza Misdemeanours Court in Cairo dismissed a lawsuit on April 26th that was filed against Imam, directors Sherif Arafa and Mohamed Fadel, and writers Wahid Hamed and Lenin el-Ramli, that accused them of contempt of religion in their artistic works, including films, television series and theatrical plays.

The ruling came less than a week after another court, the Pyramids Misdemeanours Court in Giza, convicted Imam on the same charge and sentenced him to three months in prison and a fine.

Activists and writers told Al-Shorfa that the Agouza Court ruling, which dismissed the charges against Imam, serves to protect art and artists from Islamist hardliners.

The court explained that its judgment was based upon the concept that "the freedoms of opinion and expression are among the most important elements of democratic systems, and any derogation from those rights is derogation from sound democratic governance."

"Criticism of any intellectual trend through art is not criminalised by law, and some hard-liners insist on installing themselves as guardians and defenders of the faith against threats," the court said.

"Assuming that those artistic works run contrary to their understanding of the faith, does that mean that religion was denigrated in their understanding and interpretation? Why do they portray what was presented in those works as being a threat to the faith when it was in fact a threat to their understanding and interpretation? Religion and faith in the hearts of Egyptians as a religious people is too strong to be threatened by an artistic work. But the weakness of the [accusers'] position, which stems from darkness and ignorance, is what portrays such to them," the court said in its ruling.

Responding to the claim that Imam's work demonstrated contempt of Islam and Muslims in general, and Islamist groups and the Muslim Brotherhood in particular, the court said in its ruling that "a distinction must be made between religion and religious thought on the one hand and what is sacred and what is not sacred on the other".

As for Imam's characterisation of the late Sheikh Mohamed Metwalli al-Shaarawi in the movie "El-Wad Mahrous Betaa el-Wazir", the court said it would be a grave mistake to sanctify religious clerics or their thinking.

'No real grounds' for the lawsuit against Imam

Hafez Abu Saada, a lawyer and secretary-general of the Egyptian Organisation for Human Rights, said that according to Egyptian law, there are no real grounds for the lawsuit against Adel Imam.

It is a "hisbah" lawsuit, which is banned under Egyptian law, Abu Saada said. A hisbah lawsuit is a public lawsuit filed by one person against another individual accused of contempt of religion.

In another hisbah lawsuit this year, businessman Naguib Sawiris was charged with defaming religion after he posted cartoons on his Twitter account of Mickey and Minnie Mouse in conservative Muslim attire. The court acquitted him of the charges in March.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights protects freedom of expression in writing, in art or through any other media, Abu Saada said.

"Disputes over artistic works should not be resolved in the courts but through deep constructive collective dialogue," he said.

Mohammad al-Ghaity, a screenwriter, said, "An artistic work cannot be judged by a few scenes taken out of context."

The films cited in the lawsuit as offensive to religion were made several years ago "to defend the essence of Islam, denounce terrorism, and reject associating Muslims with it", he said.

The judgment of the lawyer, Asran Mansour, who filed the lawsuit against Imam "is a personal judgment and not based on art or film criticism", al-Ghaity said.

"Judging an artistic work based on political or religious criteria leads it into a dark tunnel," he said.

'Islamist movements did not sentence Imam to prison'

During a meeting of the Islamic Group, Dr. Safwat Abdel-Ghani, a member of the group's Shura Council, said Islamist movements did not sentence Imam to prison, but it was the judges who issued the court ruling against the actor.

He asked that Islamists not be accused of sentencing Imam.

Imam starred in many films that focused on combating extremism, renouncing violence and advocating tolerance, including the film "Terrorism and Kebab" in 1994. In the film, he played a terrorist belonging to an Islamist armed group who is forced to live with an Egyptian family that embraces moderate Islam. He also starred in "The Birds of Darkness", which addresses Islamist involvement in Egyptian politics and "Hassan and Morcos", which addresses the tension between Muslims and Coptic Christians.

Mohammad Zare, a human rights activist and chairman of the Arab Penal Reform Organisation, told Al-Shorfa Imam's work is marked by seriousness and discusses "corruption and authoritarianism under the former regime of Hosni Mubarak, the muzzling of freedoms and restriction of artistic creativity [under the regime]".

Freedom of opinion is guaranteed under the Egyptian constitution, and everyone must stand against personal disputes in the courts and the intimidation tactics used by some hardliners against artists to dissuade them from discussing contemporary controversial issues, he said.

Zare said the ruling coincides with demands raised by some Islamist groups that call for internet censorship and the exercise of tighter censorship over artistic works, such as cutting "inappropriate" scenes from films.

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS ARTICLE? (TOTAL VOTES: 29)

3 Dislike(s)

ADD A COMMENT (COMMENT POLICY) * DENOTES REQUIRED FIELD

* DENOTES REQUIRED FIELD

  • READER COMMENTS

    رعد حميد

    2012-7-3

    The accusation of contempt of religion for which Adel Imam is under trial is very strange. We may disagree with Adel Imam about some of his movies, but this does not deny the value of such a big star and the valuable movies and great artistic productions in which he has performed. When Adel Imam made fun of some of the religious extremists and terrorists, it is something that most people agree on. When I see the movie "Tuyour al-Zalam," i.e. “Birds of Darkness,” it seems as if I see the regime of Mubarak and the following incidents. As for the direct insult of Islam, we did not see Adel Imam doing such a thing. I am totally convinced that it is a made-up case to distract the public opinion and make people forget about the more serious issues. The case is dangerous in particular; it is not only about Adel Imam as a person. The idea in itself is dangerous because that means a person has the right to accuse somebody and put him on trial for contempt of religion or slander and insult to Islam for performing a work of art or expressing a certain idea or story.

  • معين حسين

    2012-6-12

    I do not see any good reason to prosecute Adel Imam on those charges that were not attested by Muslim scholars. Adel Imam is a beloved public figure and his productions seek to please people and bring joy to them. His lexicon is not directed against Islam. What about wrong Fatwas issued by the House of Representatives and that no one could object against. Accusing Adel Imam of linking terrorism to Islam is incorrect, because in reality, terrorism is linked to Islam. Most of persons following these groups are exploiting religion to recruit people from a specific social class and convince them with their ideology. That’s a reality that nobody can deny. He was just pointing the finger to this reality, and trying to address it at a national level, especially that lots of youth fall prey to these groups. Do they want to prosecute him for a constructive issue or whoever initiated his trial is afraid of something and fears that his own reality will be revealed or wants to cheat the public opinion by pointing the finger on a famous figure like Adel Imam?

  • مصداق علي

    2012-6-8

    Adel Imam has exceeded being an actor, a comedian, or a superstar and reached a much higher status given that he has become part of Egyptian popular folklore. In fact, Egyptians in almost all the streets are speaking about Adel Imam every day, whether about something that relates to him or an utterance which he has uttered in a movie or a play. The best evidence of what I have said is that the entire Arab World is using his famous words in their everyday life namely (I am poor) (Is my name written?!) (a country of certificates) (I am tired) and other such famous phrases, which entered the Egyptian and Arab dictionary. In fact, the cinematic fear of the rise of political Islam and holding parliamentary and representative councils is something that we tackled in this page on the first anniversary of the 25 January Egyptian Revolution. We have also shed light on the declarations of the leadership of the Salafist Nour Party and the Freedom and Justice Party. The latter were meant to be reassuring for the Egyptians filmmakers, but they became more annoying and raised the fear about the future of the Egyptian cinema. After that, the sentence against Adel Imam has come to confirm such fears and exceeded all the expectations in this respect. Indeed, when it comes to art, Salafists have an uncanny ability to spring successive surprises, and the coming will be greater as it is the case in the declarations of one of the Salafist representatives. The latter called for covering all the statues in Egypt because they offend public morality in addition to the sentence issued against Adel Imam. This case represents a risky phenomenon that opens the door to the lawyers who are seeking to achieve fame through raising a lot of cases under the pretext of defaming Islam. Indeed, everyone knows that the Egyptian Judiciary has got dozens of such outstanding cases.

  • سليمان خالد

    2012-6-8

    The freedom of creativity, art and the freedom of opinion are an obligation, but they should not exceed the freedom of others in their religion and beliefs. In this respect, Adel Imam has flouted worshippers and the committed Muslims in a sarcastic, barbaric and gross way in his artistic works, namely his mocking of the Jilbab and the beard. It is really amazing that such a sentence would harm Islam more than all the cinema works which have been produced since the invention of the cinema, given that Allah has created human beings and endowed them with the grace of mind in order to innovate and develop life on earth. Therefore, since the laws of Islam are in the hands of people, it is impossible for any divine religion to restrict the freedom of opinion and creativity. Yet, after the current deterioration of the situation and the inability of those who are claiming themselves religious to deduce the tolerant nature of Islam and their contentment with the useless details of Islam, we have reached such a point. In fact, the latter also appoints some people as guardians of Egyptians who are declaring what they want and rejecting the things they do not like, as if Egyptians are people who neither know their religion nor their God. In addition, the emergence of an evil Islamic figure in the movie may deviate them from the right path as if the person who betrayed Salah al-Din in Acre was not Muslim, or the person who handed Egypt to the English and betrayed it were not Muslims, and those who are imprisoning and murdering the Arab people in different countries are not Muslims. You should wake up, may Allah bless you.

  • ثامر صدقي

    2012-6-8

    The seriousness of the phenomenon is that abusing Islam is related to mocking the beards and garments, specifically in the play “The Leader”, which ran for more than six years all over the Arab world, which speaks about Zinhum (Adil Imam), who looks like the unspecified ruler of an Arab state, who dies suddenly, and his retinue asks this man to replace the president in order to protect their interests. The claim also included the film of “The Terrorist”, which dealt with a well-known reality represented in targeting tourists at the hands of the political groups and carrying out acts of sabotage. Probably, we should also prosecute all those who participated in these works, not only the film. Both the films of “Hasan and Marcus” and “Murgan Ahmad Murgan”, which were deemed by the lawyer as blasphemous, were also included in the claim. Who can forget the history of this man who fought the terrorism with his art in the 1990’s and introduced his film "The Terrorist" and his play “Sayyed the Waiter” in Asyut risking his life? Who can forget that this man was the best ambassador of Egypt in the Arab world personally and in the field of acting? When this man travels to any Arab state, he is received like kings and presidents? Who can forget his films, which gave precedence to the citizen at the expense of the regime? Is it not true that Adil Imaam screamed in Wahid Hamid’s novel “Where is the Parliament?” Is it not true that Adil Imam said, “We live in the time of the hybrid” in the Yaqobian Building? Is it not true that he said, “Who sees this country from above should see it from below because it is totally different” in “Birds of Darkness”? Is it not true that Adil Imaam attacked the rich for the benefit of the poor people in this country?

  • نصر حميد

    2012-6-8

    When you hear the name of Adil Imaam, you will find yourself smiling automatically, because the name of this man was connected with the happiness and joy and he managed through his journey in the world of cinema, which exceeded more than forty years to communicate with all generations with their different directions, creeds, and classes. He preferred the simple Egyptian personality in his roles and he introduced the hard-working classes and turned into the spokesman in the most important mass media, which is the cinema. The Arabs disagreed in many things, but they agreed to the love of Adil Imaam, to the extent that if you traveled to any Arab state, they would ask you about three things, the pyramids, Nile, and Adil Imaam.

  • برهومي

    2012-6-6

    I do not know, because if they want me to laugh, I will laugh without stopping, because of the stances that have saddened us since the formation of the People’s Assembly, which failed in solving any problem until today other than trivial issues that has nothing to do with the interests of Egypt and its people. The trial of Adel Imam is funny in my opinion; because the People’s Assembly or the members of the parliament who demanded his trial did not find anyone in Egypt to be accused of despising the religions because of his comic films that made the people forget their cares. I do not see that any of his films attacks Islam in any way. He was only speaking about terrorism, extremism, and fanaticism. Islam is the religion of ease, but unfortunately, the case was introduced as if all that was achieved after the revolution is the trial of Adil Imam, while the killers, thieves, and robbers are still free. The trial became a farce and they will not achieve the renaissance, punish the killers, or even work on fighting the corruption among the people through the strange fatwas that are issued by these groups. The conditions of the people’s assembly represent a source disturbance, because the Egyptians can never be convicted by the use of such farces. This is a new useless act of the People’s Assembly and its members. Religion is not so and if they wanted to prosecute anyone, then they should have prosecuted Alyaa Al-Mahdi and her boyfriend Karim, who contradicted the religion of Islam, rather than prosecuting those who played some roles in the cinema that we cannot say whether they are allowed or not, in the absence of a fatwa that states this issue clearly. This proves that Egypt needs a strong and just president.

  • محمد احمد

    2012-6-2

    The Egyptian actor, Adel Imam, deserves more than this verdict because he has exceeded all the limits and red lines by diminishing Islam through his performances especially on theatre. While performing scenes that require to follow Islamic rules such as marriage or divorce scenes, he often goes out of the playwright's text with the intention of disdain Islam. Although, Islam saved him and his ancestors from darkness and brought them to light, and blessed them with Islam. He commits such follies to arouse the audience’s laughter but gets the anger of God, His prophet and all the believers who fear for Islam and its rules.

  • ياسين العامري

    2012-5-31

    This actor is elder and it is impossible to keep him arrested in prison, because he is supposed to be rewarded and to serve as a role model for all Egyptians; the brave Egyptians must be united on express their support for him trough the internet, Facebook and Twitter> This actor was betrayed in his life and was imprisoned by a court in Egypt. However, this verdict is illegal because he did not committed a serious crime. I just want to ask what wrong did he do in movies or plays. Is there anything else that he committed? The idol of Arabs will survive this distress, God willing. I call on all Egyptians to defend the great Arab artist until the court exonerates him form all charges, because he is an important person to all Arabs. We love him and we want him to lead an honorable life like the rest of artists. I hope that he will be released very soon. I wish all success to him, God willing.

  • موسى حكيم

    2012-5-31

    Adel Imam is one of the main actors in Egypt and the current trial is unfair. What is the crime of this actor? Is he a criminal or what? I think that the one who files the case against him was pushed to do so by a movement to prosecute this actor. I want to stress the fact that this issue is unclear and that the judges in Egypt are unjust, because what was presented by Adel Imam is beautiful art and they must admit that he is one of the main actors in Egypt and one of its idols. He gained his popularity from his plays such as “The Leader” which speaks about the rulers, “Sayyed, the Waiter” and much more other plays and films. He never said that he wants to defame Egypt or its rulers or even the Arab rulers. This is shameful and the Egyptian judges must know that they speak about a respectable actor and that this is not his problem because there were producers and directors. If the productions were wrong, then all the other participants must be punished. What is the crime of Adel Imam to be treated in this way? I swear this is wrong and shameful and I am against the judges and the court. I support Adel Imam and his heroic and polite defense. I call the Egyptians to support this brave and respectable actor who did his best to make Egypt among the best states in the field of acting.

  • نعيم

    2012-5-27

    I watched some of the plays of this actor during which he mocked the Islamic religion, particularly his play “Sayyed the Waiter” at the scene of the marriage register, who came to document the marriage. Adel Imam started uttering nonsense that is considered disgusting to any honorable or zealous person who loves his religion. In some films, he also mocked long beards and the Niqab of the Muslim woman. He worked hard to spread vice among the Muslim societies in general and among the youth in particular. Such films and movies encourage the youth to commit vice and fornication, which is promoted by Adel Imaam, who is a corrupt and shameless person. This old man does not feel ashamed when he does so at this age! He should repent to Allah and keep away from the shameful and immoral behaviors, which are only suitable for the deviant and immoral people. if this had been in my hand, I would have sent him to prison for a year, not only 3 months, and I would have prevented him from acting in films or plays, because the sublime arts must be moral and constructive in order to improve the manners of the next generations through the human message that is included in the art.

  • tamr toto71

    2012-5-26

    Participate.

  • Fasil

    2012-5-23

    We cannot bring Adel Imam to trial given that he is a good reputed actor in the artistic realm as well as at the personal level. In fact, his neighbors love him and speak well about him. He is a good man in every sense of the word given that he has neither harmed any person nor mocked religion. Thus, I would like to harshly condemn the Egyptian Judiciary which is still subject to much criticism since the era of the former regime until now. In addition, we would like to tell the Leader Adel Imam: don’t be worried since all Egyptians are with you and Allah will grant you victory.

  • يحيى العساف

    2012-5-23

    In my opinion, I could not find any justification for the Egyptian court to try an artist who is performing his duty in terms of acting, and this charge against him is not important. On the contrary, Adel Emam is a great actor and his artistic reputation and history are full of achievements. I want the respectful court to understand that the artist wants to deliver his thoughts about the problems and at the same time wants to entertain them. Who among us do not love the artist Adel Emam, his movies and plays? And all those acts should be considered because he is a respectable artist and I do not think that this is a great problem. This great artist should be rewarded for the acts he has carried out and is still carrying out in the cinema or the theater. I hope the Egyptian court will be fair because the provision here is wrong and we all support you, Adel Emam. And we will not leave you alone. On the contrary, you are a human being before everything and a respectable artist. I appreciate his poor feeling now while he is living in the darkness of the prisons with the terrorists, thieves and robbers, and murderers. Is this justice? Unfortunately, no. This is not fair as there are matters that take place with the Arabs now while they are in the most severe of circumstances and are passing through a difficult time, May God help them and help the respectable artist; the artist of the people and the Arab, Adel Emam. I respect him very much because his roles are great and influential. I would like to know one thing only; why at this particular time? Is this another one of your games? The important thing is that I really feel depressed about this great and innovative actor. May God help you in the situation of your people and yourself now? I assure you that he is innocent and this is a game planned for something that is unknown except by Almighty God.

  • عيسى بدير

    2012-5-23

    The trial of Adel Imam for insulting religion is not fair at all because he did not harm religion and all he wrote were texts that were intended to criticize the terrorist movements that exploit the religious aspect in their terrorist operations. How can we judge him for the treatment of many of issues? In the movies of Adel Imam that are shown, he chooses their topics carefully. They are most often targeted films and, indeed, his movies have addressed a host of issues. In the film about the terrorist, for example, he criticized sharply and in an ironic way the methods of the terrorist cells and showed the extent of the crimes that they carry out against the community and how they wanted to assassinate the security leaders who are only doing their duty towards protecting their homelands, and how they assassinate everyone who criticizes them. He told us the degree of the faith of every person in his job and these bodies do not have the right to criticize anyone or to expiate him for a word against him or towards them and explained how they wanted to kill him. For that he learned what they are and wanted to leave them and prove to the world that most of the recruits in those movements are being pressured by the leader of their group. The works of Adel Imam solved many problems, both social and political. If he deserved to be tried because he was expressing his point of view and as long as he never hurts the Islamic religion, then why shall we prosecute him even though he did not kill his people? Why hold him accountable while we did not hold accountable the caricature graphics offensive to the Prophet, peace be upon him, which the Danish painter painted. Why did we not hold accountable he who wanted to burn the Quran, and why are we keeping silent on the killing of Muslims all over the place? We have reached the level of searching for the most insignificant things and we put barriers to it. The trial of Adel Imam will not be fair and he does not deserve it, as all of his films were approved by the state agencies. And if they were wrong, it would be better criticized by religious scholars. But they have not done that. Thus, the Egyptian judiciary should consider the reports provided against him with impartiality and present them to the clergy, and take their opinion about them so as not to oppress him because he did not commit any crime.

  • tamer

    2012-5-22

    Art is great, provided that it reflects the issues of the society without touching, i.e. violating, religion.

  • ليلي ابراهيم

    2012-5-22

    This is enough for the Muslim Brotherhood! I swear by God, they will make the country fall.

  • خالد حسين

    2012-5-21

    I reject this trial and the false lawsuit filed against the Arab artist Adel Imam, and I criticize those who say that Adel Imam distorts religions or other persons in his works. On the contrary, all of his works simulated the reality of us, Arabs, and his works were mostly criticizing the grim reality experienced by the Arab citizen from the repressive regimes, which inherited governance decades ago. Is targeting the negative aspects and trying to treat them or clarifying them to the Arab citizen a targeting of religions and neglecting them? To my mind, I think that such issues are not true and therefore the artist, Adel Imam, should not be tried, as all the other countries in the world hail their artists and honor them, and make festivals and evenings for them in order to give them the extra motivation to move forward in their artistic works. And here we are prosecuting the artist and forwarding him to the courts to silence his voice and to try to restrict his works. Is such an unjust action right? Of course not! I reject this trial altogether and I pay tribute to the great artist, Adel Imam.

  • هاشم صبحي

    2012-5-21

    First, we all know that the great artist Adel Imam is one of the leaders of Arab Art. He is one of the artists that I did not think the artistic Arab scene could produce, a person who has the qualities of the great and giant artist, Adel Imam, because I see him as a boom in the history of the Arab art. He has contributed a lot to Arab art and the giants of the Arab art world should not be treated in such a way. Adel Imam has provided the Arab community with many purposeful works that contributed to its building and in raising the awareness of the Arab citizens, and filing a lawsuit against him at this particular time is an act that I do not accept and that none of the followers of this great artist would accept. The trial of Adel Imam has a lot of targeting of the Arab art and of the works that criticize some of the negatives that we can treat in works of art. This is what was done by the artist Adel Imam. No more targeting of the refined Arab art and no more targeting of the successful Arab artist, because the trial of Adel Imam, as I see it, is targeting the success of Arab art, and in particular the legendary artist Adel Imam. For decades, Adel Imam has been producing works that were characterized as daring, which had a great and significant impact on the Arab street. I do not think they will forget the artist Adel Imam one day or his works of art, whether these were plays or works he made for television and for the Arab viewers. An artist with this fame and popularity cannot be treated this way.

  • عدي رشيد

    2012-5-20

    No one is above the law, if Adil Imam was guilty, he will get his punishment, and if innocent the judiciary will prove that, but Adil Imam is a comedian loved by all groups adults and children, Egyptian and non-Egyptians, but if our judges are fair to such a degree, where is trial of Mubarak, Jamal and Alaa, and where is the trial of former Interior Minister Habib el-Adli, the Egyptian judiciary has became crumbling and disintegrating internally, and this makes the incentive to honest judges that should seek a revolution to end the practical life to eliminate the corrupt Egyptians rather than the pursuit of polemics the goals of which is the pursuit of fame, they should prosecute him if wrong, he is an Egyptian citizen, all rules apply on him that apply on the others, but at the same time, we should give him a fair trial and with integrity.

  • امجد سعيد جاسم

    2012-5-17

    Let's not forget that Adel Imam is an actor who does not commit to the scripts. Ever since he started his acting career, he has been like that. For example, "Madrasat al-Moshagbeen" was a play that insulted education and teachers, "Shahid Mashfsh Haga" violated the traditions and ethics, and "Sayed al-Shaghal" violated the manners, history and religion. There are even worse examples, so we have to stop him. Art is beautiful and comedy is necessary. There is nothing wrong with being creative in acting, but it has to be within the proper limits. We don't deny that those plays succeeded and they had some good and expressive topics. But, we need to avoid any insults or violation of ethics. Freedom is not violation and shamelessness.

  • امجد سعيد جاسم

    2012-5-16

    We used to wish from a long time ago that the day would come when actor Adel Imam would stop insulting the manners and honors of the people of Egypt. I don't forget when I heard his sentence that he is moving because a dancer is living under his apartment and that people spend the night in the street. Is not that a violation of the honor of families? In addition to other things he said, such as using insults and violation of taboos to become famous. If someone else did that, he would have been expelled from the Actors Syndicate, but his financial balance (fortune) was good. His violation of beliefs and religion are many, so I think the one who issued that verdict is an honest Egypt regardless of his belief. As for the one defending him, it seems he wants to walk around without his clothes on in the name of freedom.

  • JOE SAMY

    2012-5-8

    It seems that Egypt is heading towards an Inquisition Era under the reign of obscurantist groups who are trying to have complete control over all forms of life in Egypt. But they will never be able to devour the cake completely alone. The awareness of our people will reveal the true face of those gangs who strive to achieve their personal objectives, and to hell with the people.

  • سامح معين

    2012-5-8

    Muslim Brotherhood, you corrupted the country. Now you want to defame the artists?

  • 2012-5-7

    May God protect our country!

  • mahetabahmed

    2012-5-7

    Honestly, he mocked the religious people too much in his films.

  • محسن

    2012-5-5

    Before saying anything, I would like to express with all pride my complete solidarity with the great artist, the beloved of the audiences, Leader Adel Imam against this unjust ruling. With all regret, I say that this investigation ruling (which refers to Inquisition rulings in the dark ages) is against, art, creativity and the right to freedom as symbolized by artist Adel Imam, the pioneer of Arab cinema and theater. He is an artistic icon. He is an international artist who has a distinguished position and great popularity. He is an artistic value and a national treasure not only to Egypt but to the Arab and Islamic world as well.

  • نهاد سالم

    2012-5-5

    I wonder why you do not close the Danish or the French Embassy in Egypt and particularly the Israeli one. Haven’t they attacked Islam and Muslims? Should these countries pay the fine? Or, I wonder whether the Muslim Brotherhood have only the courage to attack one of the icons of the original art, the leader Adel Imam.

  • لقمان حسين

    2012-5-5

    We are all with the leader Adel Imam. We support him and we love him very much. We love him because he is with us in our houses and hearts as well as in our conversations and laughs. In fact, Adel Imam has made us cry and laugh many times. The leader actor or the actor leader Adel Imam has also taught us or rather taught generations through his human artistic message. This wonderful master artist who has exposed the tyrants, dictatorships and their executioners has exposed their lies and their pretenses of patriotism and false Arabism. In fact, he has exposed them, their corruption, their falsehood and the fakeness of their slogans with much courage. In addition, this genius and daring actor loved his country and people and combated terrorism and terrorists. He has also combated their evil and hostility against society and the State. Adel Imam has exposed their legitimate and illegitimate tricks, their exploitation of religion, their trade in religion and their manipulation of people’s feelings. Furthermore, he has faced the attempt to stigmatize the nation and make communities ignorant and pull them backward into the dark ages. This worthy master artist has tried through his artistic message to raise the awareness of communities and advance them. He has also fought faithfully and honorably in order to thwart the project making people ignorant as well as the project of cultural and intellectual binding and fettering of Arab Muslim people through his fine art and distinguished performance. Therefore, thanks to his unique artistic career and rich honorable history in wonderful works and a lot of movies and nice pieces of drama, the works of Adel Imam will undoubtedly remain timeless given that they are daring, great and distinguished works which have been ingrained in the minds and hearts of millions of the people who love the leader Adel Imam very much.

  • حسين صديق محمد

    2012-5-5

    There are limits to freedom. Thus, it is not permissible to curse or insult a particular person in any media product, which is why you always read in films and serials “the events and people have nothing to do with people in reality”. On the other hand, we cannot shoot or broadcast a pornographic movie under the pretext of freedom. I wonder you feel angry and then you call it oppression when the standards of freedom come to insult religion or the creed. It is really sad. I would like to tell you, Sister, that we do not take our standards from other countries but we set them appropriately and suitably. In this respect, I would like to remind everyone that the world’s major countries such as the USA were not just built today. They have rather been established and gained their strength in the previous century. At that time, there was a religious radicalism that did not allow them to remove everything compared to what is taking place these days. In fact, in the early sixties and until the so-called the Love revolution, women have been discriminated against. Thus, why should we allow such a person to take an ugly image and attribute it to our religion? Unfortunately, he has not presented an honorable image of the first religion which really granted women their rights, namely inheritance, maternity, kinship, honor and chastity in an era where women were used to be bought, sold and inherited. Unfortunately, women and their bodies are still considered as commodities that are bought and sold. In fact, some people are still defending the selling of women in public like another type of cattle trade market.

  • نعمان

    2012-5-5

    I can confirm the opposite of the expectations and hopes of all the enemies of freedom, awareness, art and creativity. This dogmatic governance has brought about the opposite given that it has increased people’s love, infatuation, adherence and assistance of the Leader and beloved actor Adel Imam, the artist of the people and the glorious great artistic icon. This has also revealed or let’s say proven the falsification and the systematic deception of many of the dogmatic and Takfiri people. This has also reflected their great fear of the honesty, courage and positive impact of the leader actor Adel Imam, his successful acts and the truth of his expectations about the extent of falsehood of many people who are endorsing political Islam. The latter are operating under the umbrella of Islam and employing it to serve their political and personal interests and to impose their dogmatic ideology and logic on the country and society.

  • احمد عبد الرزاق

    2012-5-5

    The Egyptian Judiciary is not an exception compared to the other institutions in the country in terms of their hostility against human rights, freedom and creativity. In fact, this medieval judgment against Adel Imam has proven the backwardness of the Egyptian courts which are clearing the executioners of the revolution and governing the rebels. This judgment against Adel Imam is not a judgment, but it is rather a brotherhood Salafi Fatwa against creativity and freedom in society.