Red_arrow

Would you like to make English your default language, on this site? |

New Jordanian cabinet receives mixed reviews

Jordanian King Abdullah II is pictured with new cabinet members who were appointed by Prime Minister Maruf Al-Bakhit [Al-Shorfa/Ali Al-Rawashdeh]

Jordanian King Abdullah II is pictured with new cabinet members who were appointed by Prime Minister Maruf Al-Bakhit [Al-Shorfa/Ali Al-Rawashdeh]

  • COMMENT

    5

  • Print this article
  • increase decrease

Prime Minister Maruf al-Bakhit's new cabinet line-up generated mixed reactions among Jordanians, while Islamists were quick to declare their reservations.

There are 27 ministers in al-Bakhit's cabinet, which was announced on Wednesday (February 9th), including five ministers from the previous government led by Samir Rifai.

The new government includes representatives from a broad spectrum of civil society institutions and political parties. Bakhit appointed two women to the cabinet, Haifa Abu Ghazaleh, the minister for tourism and antiquities and Salwa Al-Damen, the minister for social development. There are no members of parliament in the cabinet. Thirteen ministers are serving in their capacity for the first time.

The Labour Party, which includes 20 deputies, issued a statement saying it will wait until the ministerial statement is released before deciding whether to grant a vote of confidence to the new government. The opposition party, the Islamic Action Front (the largest party in Jordan), expressed reservations.

"The Islamic Action Front rejected the prime minister's invitation for the party to serve in his government through several ministerial portfolios during meetings the last few days," Jamil Abu Bakr, a spokesperson for the Islamic Action Front Party (IAF) and a member of its executive office, told Al-Shorfa.

He added, "This is not a rejection that is 'set in stone' by the Islamists against the government. The government's action will influence the Islamic Action Front's position, not merely the names of ministers and their portfolios."

Abu Bakr said the IAF had recently sent the prime minister a formal written memorandum with a specific list of the party's demands.

The memorandum included an invitation to discuss changes to the election law that would combine the advantages of two electoral systems (proportional representation and electoral districts), ensure the supervision of elections by an independent body, and amend the law on public meetings.

The memorandum called for an end to government censorship of the media, an improvement in the lives of citizens, a campaign to fight corruption in all forms, expansion of health care services, and establishment of a trade union for teachers.

Mohammad Abu Rumman, a political analyst, argued that the new government represented a "conciliatory government that included civil society organisations, especially those that were leading the demonstrations in the street to protest the high cost of living and corruption".

Bakhit pledged to pursue real reform, increase freedom, and lay the foundation for dialogue. He also pledged to support a "deep and serious dialogue" with the various forces in the country, pointing out that a loyal opposition is "a key partner for the government, and it operates from a position that has respect and legal safeguards".

Regarding media freedom, Bakhit said the government "will consult with the press corps to discuss everything that can be modified or added within the legislative framework concerning access to information".

Jordanians expressed differing views about the new government and its ability to meet the expectations of the population.

"The new government is capable of handling the current situation because the ministers represent institutions of civil society and various political groups that have declared objectives," Ayat Moaz, an employee at a private company, said.

Hassan Ismail, a retired accountant in his 50s, said he expected tangible progress and reforms in the political and economic arenas.

Ismail said he will not rush to judge the new government "but will wait for 100 days to evaluate real achievements on the ground".

He said, "Living conditions have deteriorated because of rising food prices. The demonstrations and sit-ins that occurred in different parts of the Kingdom sought political reform and improved living conditions. This situation places an enormous burden on the new government to ease tensions over corruption."

Jumana Al-Ghanimat, a journalist, said the current government is capable of carrying out real reforms.

"The prime minister appointed credible political figures with substantial expertise although he was compelled to keep some ministers from the Rifai government, notably the ministers of finance, planning, water, interior and foreign affairs," she told Al-Shorfa.

Al-Ghanimat said, "All of these individuals and others have engaged with the street from their previous positions in ways that support political and economic reform."

Baddi Salem, a professor of business administration, questioned whether the prime minister can handle the demands of the current situation.

"Al-Bakhit has already served as head of government between 2005 and 2007, and he failed to make any progress in terms of economic and political development," he said.

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS ARTICLE? (TOTAL VOTES: 1)

0 Dislike(s)

ADD A COMMENT (COMMENT POLICY) * DENOTES REQUIRED FIELD

* DENOTES REQUIRED FIELD

  • READER COMMENTS

    سعيد كاظم

    2011-4-14

    It is a good makeup of Ministers; twenty of them were not replaced, except some persons for the sake of the public interest and for the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, which is one of the most important countries and the most elaborate in making decisions. Thus, what the country did was for the sake of public interest, because the King knows what is good for the country, and all issues and topics are under control. In fact, the person who wants to change the constitution or the administrative system should have enough knowledge about what is happening in the Hashemite Kingdom. Thus, the replacement of some members of the new government is a good and useful thing, because a good ruler can create a good and successful future, and may God help us.

  • خالد فلاح

    2011-2-20

    I believe that what the Jordanian monarch is doing, in an attempt to appease the Jordanian people, is insufficient. The people are demanding more, and they want the resignation of the government and the formation of a government with new blood that will serve the country and the citizens, and will improve the situation in the country and the lives of the people. As such, despite the sacking of the government by the king, the Jordanian people still have their reservations regarding the person that has been charged with the formation of the new government, because he is not approved by the people. They have many reservations regarding him. The people should be given the freedom to choose whomever they want to represent them and those who would head the ministries in the country in the future, with all these many changes taking place in the Arab region.

  • حازم

    2011-2-16

    I say to the king of Jordan: “Enough disregard towards Jordanians.” Does he really think that dissolving the government just to make up another one will satisfy the demands of his people? In fact, Jordanians, just like Tunisians and Egyptians, must revolt. Kings must respect their peoples! You know the destiny of Ben Ali and Mubarak, who disrespected their people! You ought to learn a lesson and serve the people who suffered from your filthiness and stupidity.

  • معاذ

    2011-2-16

    Whoever has witnessed events in the Arab world is shocked. Everyone is wondering about the reasons for such simultaneous revolutions and uprisings in many Arab countries. In fact, we see that some Arab leaders have altered their attitudes. Some rulers rushed to make some reforms, amended constitutions, or promised not to run for another term. Protesting demonstrations in Jordan led King Abdullah Bin Al-Hussein to dismiss his government and to task his Prime Minister with making up a reformist one. I am sure that the Jordanian King is reluctant to make real changes in the Kingdom. In fact, he wants to change only the names in power, in order to circumvent the demands of the masses by making cosmetic changes, regardless of the Jordanians’ true demands. I am also sure that people will protest against their King, who underestimated them, and the new government which will change nothing.

  • باغي الهوى

    2011-2-15

    The king of Jordan has not made any changes that aim at providing assistance to the people and helping to ease their suffering. They are just promises written in the quicksand in order to avoid public outrage, as part of the policy followed in finding peaceful solutions to the crises in the country. Because of the congestion in the Jordanian street and the dissatisfied feeling of the citizens, broad masses of the people of Jordan came out in a peaceful demonstration to demand that the government be brought down and that reforms be made, including reducing the prices of materials, cutting taxes, which have become a significant factor behind the low per-capita income and the high poverty rate among the people of the community. The king of Jordan immediately sacked the government of Rifai and tasked Bakhit with forming a new government in order to defuse the crisis in the country. He also made promises to resolve all outstanding problems, including higher prices, the shortfall of services, fighting unemployment and working to preserve the national unity of the Jordanian people. We call upon the king of Jordan to make real changes that benefit the Jordanian citizens to alleviate their suffering, and not to make just promises in order to present a good image before public opinion everywhere.