Red_arrow

Would you like to make English your default language, on this site? |

Sheikh Mohamed Ali Ajalan: al-Qaeda's actions lack legitimacy

FAISAL DAREM/Al-Shorfa] Sheikh Ajalan says providing security for the citizens of Yemen against al-Qaeda attacks is a priority.

FAISAL DAREM/Al-Shorfa] Sheikh Ajalan says providing security for the citizens of Yemen against al-Qaeda attacks is a priority.

  • COMMENT

    4

  • Print this article
  • increase decrease

Sheikh Mohamed Ali Ajalan, head of the Shura Council of the opposition Islah party --the largest Islamist party in Yemen and leader of the opposition-- said that al-Qaeda's actions have no legitimate basis in Islamic law.

Ajalan told Al-Shorfa that al-Qaeda's targeting of soldiers at security checkpoints and army personnel in the southern governorates of Abyan and Shabwa are acts requiring a confrontation.

He called on all segments of the population, including party leaders and sheikhs to stand up against al-Qaeda, and for the state to strike with an iron fist to protect its troops and combat al-Qaeda.

Al-Shorfa: What is your assessment of the recurring attacks taking place against soldiers?

Ajalan: These treacherous assaults against soldiers in Shabwa and Abyan are evil acts by all standards. It is impermissible to [spill] the blood of a Muslim unless he attacks and is an assailant, because attacking soldiers in particular and Muslims in general is not sanctioned by Islamic law or by other laws. I condemn the targeting of security personnel taking place in the provinces of Abyan and Shabwa, as well as the silence of political forces in the area.

Al-Shorfa: You have called on the state to crack down on these offenders, especially in regard to their attacks on soldiers. Why?

Ajalan: Security is the state's responsibility first, and all groups should take part in this task, as it is everyone's responsibility. The protection of Muslim blood and lives is one of the state's most important duties. If this duty [is not fulfilled] life as a whole is disrupted. The state must thus strike with an iron fist to make its soldiers, citizens and roads secure, because security is the first duty demanded of the state.

Al-Shorfa: Security sources said that al-Qaeda was behind these attacks, and the organisation declared responsibility for these operations on more than one occasion.

Ajalan: In no instance is an attack on Muslim blood permissible—whoever the aggressor, whether by al-Qaeda or another group—so they must be countered. Moreover, al-Qaeda's methodology has no legitimate basis. We turn to God Almighty for the targeting of security personnel is a major sin, a serious offence and an assault on the greatest sanctity for God, which is blood and Muslims. The Prophet, peace be upon him, said, "Your blood, your properties and your honour are sacred." Man is still within the bounds of his religion unless he sheds sacred blood. So how is it if this sacred Muslim blood [is shed] during the month of Ramadan, at a time when the gates of sedition are closed?

Those who carry out these criminal acts must not revert to biased, empty propaganda and commit such heinous crimes, which violate the sanctity of Muslims and Muslim blood—because when someone kills a person and defiles the land, it is as though he killed all people, and when someone gives life, it is as though he gives life to all people. It is impermissible to shed a Muslim's blood or violate his sanctity, whether he is civilian or military, unless he commits an outright act of disbelief, as the Prophet says, peace be upon him, [which is] declared and apparent in private and public.

Al-Shorfa: What do you say to those who remained silent about these crimes?

Ajalan: It is impermissible for any group, entity, or region to be complacent or silent about [these crimes], because doing so means they are complicit in the sin and this is defilement upon the land forbidden by God.

I call on all political forces—ruling and opposition—and sheikhs and tribes to stand as one behind the state, which holds the authority, the right and the ability to provide citizens with security. I also demand that the violation of this sanctity not be downplayed and that [they] declare their absolute rejection of involvement in such crimes because those who are complacent about it are complicit in the sin.

I call on the people of the provinces where these crimes and attacks are happening to stand by the state, as it is a legal duty of citizens in those areas to not hide a criminal because the criminal violates these sacrosanct values. Even if he passes onto holy ground, he must be cast out and exposed. How could it be otherwise?

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS ARTICLE? (TOTAL VOTES: 2)

0 Dislike(s)

ADD A COMMENT (COMMENT POLICY) * DENOTES REQUIRED FIELD

* DENOTES REQUIRED FIELD

  • READER COMMENTS

    ود صقر

    2011-1-11

    First, I write this comment for the sake of God. The brothers who wrote the comments only looked at the issue from one perspective. I agree with them that it is unacceptable to harm any Muslim, whether he is civilian or not. Anyone testifying that “There is none worthy of worship but God” must be protected as to his blood, honor and money. This is true, but were it not for Al-Qaeda and their attacks on the USA or the so-called Western camp, those people would not have feared Islam as they do now. We know that after the fall of the Soviet Union, the Westerners planned to get rid of Islam with or without the presence of Al-Qaeda. The people of Al-Qaeda are mujahidin, and the other Muslims work in this life. Do you want all of us to be engaged in useless political talk and discussions? Beware, because this deception must stop.

  • الحق

    2010-9-15

    A new fatwa was recently issued by the highest religious institution in Saudi Arabia, regarding the prohibition of financing terrorism. In addition, the majority of the Salafi scholars criticizes Al-Qaeda, fights its methodology, and warns against its ideology, especially in the Arab and Muslim countries.

  • خليفة بن سالم

    2010-9-12

    I'm certain that Islam is far from al-Qaeda and its takfiri ideologies. We have never seen Muslims cutting off heads, slaughtering, and bombing innocent people, and that's because this great and tolerant religion forbids such acts. There's no cleric in any of the Arab countries who supports terrorism and al-Qaeda, or who has issued any fatwa in their favor. On the contrary, everybody is angry with them and expresses their resentment for the terrorists and their deeds, and rejects any link between terrorism and Islam. All the fatwas have banned cooperating and dealing with them, because these criminals have abused religion and tried to exploit the Muslim youth, and interpreted many of the verses improperly, in order to serve their cheap agenda. Thus, al-Qaeda is a terrorist organization that has no relation with Islam or any other heavenly religion.

  • محمد باقر

    2010-9-12

    How can we consider that al-Qaeda represents the Islamic religion? It was the main and the first entity responsible for distorting the reputation of Islam, through the crimes it committed everywhere. Al-Qaeda and its members are trying to distort Islam using different means and ways. And if we conduct a referendum, we will find that the Muslims' resentment of al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is greater than the resentment of the other religions to them. Islamic countries are suffering from terrorism and al-Qaeda more than the others; especially since they continuously receive terrorist attacks. And I don't believe there's any relation or connection between the principles of the Islamic religion and the ideology of al-Qaeda.