[Sean Gallup/Getty Images] Iraqi Minister of Defence Abdul Qader al-Obeidi said security forces are prepared for all challenges.
Iraqi Minister of Defence Abdul Qader al-Obeidi reiterated his confidence in the Iraqi forces and their ability to maintain security in Iraq after the withdrawal of US forces.
In an exclusive interview with Mawtani.com on Monday (August 2nd), al-Obeidi said Iraq "has gone past the stage of working to improve the security situation and entered the stage of security stability."
He said that building up Iraqi forces is an ongoing process, adding that the Iraqi Army has created an atmosphere of safety in Iraqi cities.
"This will certainly continue after the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq," he said.
The United States is on schedule to reduce its troop levels to 50,000 by September 1, 2010, before the final withdrawal from Iraq by the end of 2011.
"The Iraqi security commands are prepared for all security challenges," al-Obeidi said. "They are capable of managing the security file, whether in Baghdad or in any other Iraqi province."
The defense minister played down al-Qaeda's ability to threaten security or drag Iraq back into the violence of previous years.
"Al-Qaeda is dying out in Iraq," he said. "It has lost most of its important leaders, who were either killed or arrested, and the same thing also happened to the rest of the terrorist groups."
According to al-Obeidi, the Ministry of Defence has drawn up an extensive three-stage armament plan through 2020.
The first stage, set to end by 2012, includes providing resources to protect Iraq's infrastructure and support domestic security. The second and third stages include supplying the air force and air defense with modern weaponry.
Iraqi Interior Ministry spokesperson Alaa al-Taey also expressed his confidence in the ability of Iraqi police to maintain security in Iraqi cities and neighbourhoods after the withdrawal of US forces.
"The upcoming stage will be important and decisive for Iraqi security agencies, given that they will have to act on their own to deal with the challenges of the security file," al-Taey told Mawtani.com.
"However, there is a message of reassurance for all Iraqis and the entire world, to the effect that Iraq now has a force that no terrorist group can cope with," al-Taey said. "These are not mere words, but a fact based on accurate scientific data and figures."
Lt. Gen. Othman al-Ghanemi, commander of operations in southern Iraq, added that the Iraqi Army is no longer preoccupied with defensive operations and rebuffing terrorist attacks.
"We have entered a new stage, which is cleaning the cities of terrorists," al-Ghanemi told Mawtani.com. "We have finished the stage of rebuffing attacks and defence only. We are now stronger than ever, and we can defend our Iraqi homeland from north to south."
Security officials also praised the Iraqi army's neutrality in handling security affairs, which they say dispel fears the army becoming politicized or divided on sectarian lines.
"We have adopted the slogan 'Iraq First' and we are still adopting it and acting under it," said Maj. Gen. Mardhi al-Dulaimi of the Iraqi Army. "The army is above sectarianism and nationalist sentiments, and will always be an important factor in the establishment of security and stability in Iraq. It will also protect all Iraqis."
"However, citizen support for Iraqi forces is very important," al-Dulaimi said. "Therefore, we call on them to cooperate with security forces, confirming to them that we are about to declare our final victory and get rid of the cancer that is represented by terrorism."
ADD A COMMENT (COMMENT POLICY) * DENOTES REQUIRED FIELD
READER COMMENTS
2010-9-9
Today, we see that the Arab states do not support Iraq as it should be supported, based on what Iraq provided to these countries in the past. After what happened in Iraq, these Arab countries turned a blind eye, as if Iraq were not an Arab state, and they did not intervene to stop the bloodshed, or even to support Iraq to maintain its sovereignty and independence. We see that they have given up on Iraq almost entirely, as if it were a strange state with no common interests, or as if they did not share the same fateful goals. They left Iraq alone to suffer from terrorism and underdevelopment, which happened in Iraq in the previous period. They did not support the Iraqi issue, but rather some of them worked to increase the crisis and paid money to consolidate the problems and the lack of security. Iraq was left to regional states to interfere and manipulate it in whatever way they wanted. Instead of supporting it and standing with it honorably, as it stood with them, the Arab countries helped to ruin it more and more, so the security situation deteriorated. We do not know why they are afraid of the rise of Iraq. The fact that Iraq is the richest country in the world, I think, prevents them from helping it to rise up again, because they know Iraq and its people well. They know that if Iraq and its economy and security rise once again, it will be the first country among them in all fields. We believe that they do not want to give it the opportunity to advance, but the time is sufficient to respond to their negative attitude towards Iraq after being the fall of its powers at a time. They do not care about this matter, but took advantage of the fall of Iraq and the situation that prevailed for their own interest and to develop their own countries. They quickly forgot Iraq, which has always helped them when they pass through such circumstances, or others. We hope now to open a new page and to see these countries move to help stabilize security in Iraq.
2010-9-9
The Arab countries should support Iraq after the withdrawal of the U.S. forces, because Iraq has always supported the Arab states and their national interests, and has played a strong role in protecting the territory of the Arab world on the basis of one interest and common goals. Iraq has honorable positions regarding the issues of the Arab nation, and has supported many Arab countries which were formerly poor. It defended the regional and Arab countries whose rights were violated. It sacrificed a lot of martyrs in their support and in the support of the Arab nation in all, protecting the eastern gateway to the Arab world and protecting it for many years in defense of the Arabs against foreign interventions.
راميل
2010-9-8
Talking about the security vacuum that may emerge after the withdrawal of U.S. forces is of no importance, as the U.S. forces already withdrew from the streets in 2006.
احمد رسول
2010-9-8
I think that the withdrawal of the friendly forces from Iraq is evidence of the growing abilities of the Iraqi army and police. This also proves that the latter are now able to protect Iraqis from the harm of terrorism and its great challenges. I hope that no security violations occur at present. I also hope that the Iraqi security forces will take this great responsibility seriously, and will not allow any negligence or slackness in carrying out their duties, which may serve the interests of those who want to harm Iraq and its safety. In fact, these people were betting on the withdrawal of the US troops from Iraq in order to bring down the political process, to bring Iraq into a civil war and to kill Iraqis. We also hope that Mr. Nouri al Maliki, as the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, issues strict orders so that the security forces will be extremely cautious and act rapidly if any security violation occurs and not tolerate anyone who threatens security, especially during this critical period. In fact, our security forces are now at risk and in real individual confrontations. Therefore, we must deal severely with whoever threatens Iraqi security, so as to prove the ability of these forces in facing threats and preserving the lives of Iraqis and Iraq’s security.
عمر السعدي
2010-9-5
The Iraqi government, politicians and Iraqi media should take a firm stand against countries supporting terrorism. Iraq should start submitting evidence to prove the involvement of any state or foreign body, without exceptions, or sectarian political or personal bias, by submitting formal complaints to the UN Security Council, demanding the imposition of severe sanctions against these countries. In case the UN Security Council fails to discourage these countries from its spoiling role, Iraq must resort to the same way of treatment, and it is a legitimate right, despite being immoral. Also, the method of reward and punishment should be imposed, by using the issue of trade exchange to put pressure upon the states that support terrorism in Iraq.
حيدر
2010-9-4
All the Arab countries follow with interest the practical steps of the withdrawal of the U.S. troops from Iraq, as they consider it an important step towards restoring the full sovereignty, freedom and independence of Iraq. We are confident that Iraq is capable of shouldering its national, Arab and international responsibilities in protecting the unity and integrity of the Iraqi lands and passing through this phase in its modern history, as well as working on achieving the comprehensive national reconciliation. We demand that all the Iraqi leaders work together responsibly to accelerate the formation of a national unity government that embodies the free will, about which the Iraqi people expressed themselves in the recent elections. We also demand that the Iraqi government reject all forms of external interference that aim at affecting the interests of Iraq, the souls of its children, and the national Iraqi unity.
اهل العراق
2010-8-30
I am concerned about Iraq and its people after the departure of the Americans.
سمير
2010-8-26
The Iraqi security forces are able to maintain security and stability in Iraq, whether U.S. forces are in Iraq, or after the withdrawal of their troops. Good evidence is what is happening now. In fact, the Iraqi forces have been fighting terrorism for many years. They were facing the challenges alone, without the US forces’ direct intervention. Besides, the Iraqi forces have grown increasingly experienced in the guerilla war tactics used by al Qaeda and the other terrorist armed groups in recent years. This experience alone can make the Iraqi forces capable of confronting, challenging and resisting for a long time. Thus, terrorism will vanish, but Iraq will still be alive, till the end of times.
منير السيد جميل
2010-8-26
Many awful images may come to mind about the destiny of Iraq and its people after the withdrawal of the American forces, who have been spread all over the territory of Iraq since the latest war. However, I disagree with anyone promoting such awful and dark images, because they distort the image of the Iraqi heroes, who have resisted all the dirty types of attacks against the richest armies and invaders for a long time. So what do Al Qaeda and the terrorists think? They are only feathers in the strong Iraqi wind, which will destroy them if they attempt to harm Iraqis once again. Despite all the security violations, I am sure that terrorism cannot go any further. On the contrary, nowadays it is witnessing its weakest periods. It is also admitting its defeat, through the operations that serve simply as advertisements, just after the blows that terrorism received from the police, the army and all the other brave security services.
فهمي
2010-8-23
If Iran does not interfere in our affairs after the US withdrawal, we will be fine. Iran should be informed that its religious extremism has isolated it from the Muslim community. It has also isolated itself from the international community because of its non-methodical ideologies. And if ever it is attacked or sanctioned, I do not think it will find assistance in the gloomy days it will witness, except from its party leaders, which have absorbed the ideology of extremism. These parties are like bubbles which disappear as the battle grows fierce. What worsened the situation was Iran’s thoughtless stance toward Dr. Iyad Allawi, whose ideology claims that our relations with Iran will be based on respect, the non-interference principle in domestic affairs and assistance, etc. In fact, it was very probable that Dr. Iyad Allawi would play a role in shaping Iran’s future if he took power in Iraq. This will be in terms of his relationships and mediation, to halt any aggression against innocent Iranians. However, the Iranian government pursued its extremism, and this fact has contributed to further isolating it. In fact, we do not want any aggression against Iran, but they are free to determine their stances toward their neighboring countries and the world’s countries. The opportunity still exists for them to review their support for the person who is able to alter the political process in Iraq and in the region as a whole, for the benefit of all.
ماجد
2010-8-23
If we return to political sectarianism, and if force replaces democracy and becomes the solution, then the law of the jungle will prevail, enforced by the regression of the role of justice and its weakness, as is happening now.
هشام
2010-8-23
Iraq is ready for the U.S. withdrawal, and this can be easily noticed in the performance of the Iraqi police. The latter have started to track down terrorists directly, and have arrested many of them, since the police was made up soon after the collapse of the former dictatorial regime. In fact, the Iraqi police have sacrificed the lives of their brave members, who died in the operations carried out against the terrorists and their dens. For instance, the Iraqi police have grown more caring about the citizens’ comfort and security, while they used to harm and torture them, as was the case in the past. Indeed, the police were working against citizens rather than serving them. The arrest of a large number of terrorists, jailing and prosecuting them for the crimes they committed, contributed to regaining peace in the country. In addition, the deployment of the police in the streets day and night was the reason behind restricting the spread of chaos and terrorism.
ماجد
2010-8-23
If we return to sectarianism, and if force replaces democracy and becomes the solution, then the law of the jungle will prevail, enforced by the regression of the role of justice and its weakness, as is happening now.
2010-8-23
Iran, like other neighboring countries, should not interfere in Iraqi domestic affairs. It should rather keep distant from the political process and its parties in Iraq.
2010-8-23
Iraq is for Iraqis only.
بدران
2010-8-23
We, the Iraqi people, are in favor of the American withdrawal from Iraq, since our country needs to be independent without any foreign presence. As for the possibility of a civil war breaking out in Iraq, it is not possible now, because the Iraqis know that civil war results only in death and destruction, not in the building of this country. For this reason, I don't think that there is any Iraqi who accepts the violent acts that existed from 2006 to 2007, where all we saw was dead corpses in the streets. The best solution is talks and discussions. I hope that Arabs will not intervene in this subject because they wish the destruction of Iraq. They are still mourning the vermin president Saddam Hussein, because they are stupid like him, and they don't understand the meaning of democracy, as they are used to misery in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordon, Kuwait, Syria and all the Arab countries, surrounded by a group of thieves. Long live Iraq, despite the suffering endured by the Iraqi people, and God bless all those who are no longer with us because of sectarian violence. God's curse be upon any Arab who attacks Iraq, either with booby-trapped cars or even with the evil thoughts suggested in his comments, and who wishes destruction upon Iraq.
2010-8-22
I do not think that the withdrawal of U.S. troops will cause destruction in Iraq, because Iraq cannot be easily penetrated, especially in this unacceptable way. The Iraqi people are a strong and patient people, who enjoy good hearts. This may not be obvious to some Arab brothers, or even to the Western world, which has no idea about Iraq. Moreover, all components of the Iraqi society are united through the blood relationships. I also think that if the terrorists and their sponsors achieved their goal of igniting a sectarian war in Iraq, and the security forces failed in maintaining control over the security situation, then we have the strong and great Iraqi tribes, which have had a great role in the eradication of the terrorist groups. All Iraqis are sure that their chieftains will prevent any person of their tribes from committing such acts or from following the unacceptable designs of the terrorists.
2010-8-22
After the withdrawal of U.S. forces, Iraq will go through many crises, but most of them will be political, not democratic, because the Iraqi people know their way and have tasted freedom and will never accept turning back to point zero. Rather, the Iraqis want to see progress on all levels in Iraq after the change. There will be no place for those who reject democracy in Iraq. So, I think that the democratic process will continue in Iraq forever, because Saddam Hussein was a big lesson to anyone who thinks of adopting tyranny and destroying democracy in the country. I do not think that any one of the Iraqi politicians want to face the fate of Saddam Hussein and to be thrown into the dustbin of history. Hence, democracy will continue in Iraq, with some problems regarding the offices of the politicians and sharing them between the parties.
IRAQI
2010-8-22
Iraq will not witness any sectarian war, whether the U.S. troops stay or withdraw from Iraq. Iraq is a united country with all of its sects, groups, colors, and religions.
سلام التركي
2010-8-19
The Iraqi Defense Ministry does not perform its duty in defending Iraq from terrorists and terrorists correctly, as they are not committed to this duty. The Ministry of Defense does not check the performance of its personnel at the checkpoints and lets them do whatever they wish. Today we see the soldier in the failed Iraqi armed forces, which are not ready to defend Iraq and its people, because they annoy the citizens at the checkpoints and violate their human rights, about which they know nothing. They do not know that respecting the Iraqi citizen is one of their duties that must be implemented. Hence, the Iraqi Defense Ministry in fact has no role to play in the security work in Iraq, and a large part of the administrative and financial corruption is in this ministry; hence, we have to pay attention.
Samar
2010-8-19
The security institution in Iraq has a strong influence on the country, but because most of the officers and employees of this ministry are not capable of assuming their responsibilities, the Iraqi government must clean up the institution of those who collaborate with the terrorists and saboteurs, and make this important institution in Iraq immune against politicization, sectarianism, and ethnicity. It must be under the command of people who can manage things well and are able to assume responsibility in case of any security breach. Moreover, the performance of the Defense Ministry is very poor in terms of the implementation of duties, and it lacks the necessary abilities to protect the Iraqi citizens, in addition to its failure in protecting the Iraqi borders. We all know that the borders are infiltrated by terrorists who enter and leave whenever they wish. Certainly, this occurs due to the inefficiency and to the appointing of the wrong people to the wrong positions. We must therefore focus on this ministry of the Iraqi government, and have it take care of the country, not the officials.
ضياء الدين عبد الحكم
2010-8-17
Building the Iraqi armed forces should be a priority for the Iraqi government, because the withdrawal of the friendly U.S. troops from Iraq in 2011 will leave a huge vacuum in the Iraqi armed forces. Therefore, the Iraqi government and the Iraqi parliament should form the new elected government as soon as possible and find quick solutions concerning the building of the army and Iraqi security forces by calling negligent people to account. Dishonest officials who deal with external actors or participate in conducting suspicious actions, and those who are suspected of belonging to terrorist organizations or armed militias, should be arrested and brought to justice, to rid the ranks of the army and police of those elements that do not want Iraq to move forward. This can also be done through the training of the security forces, the army and the police on all weapons, and bringing them into long-term training courses to be trained in unarmed combat and dismantling explosive devices. They should also be provided with military equipment, and those who are responsible for supplying military units should be urged to distribute military equipment and not to store them in the warehouses of the military bases, as they may deteriorate before the army can benefit from them. These matters make the fighters at the checkpoints and on the streets, in a poor state of mind and determination to fight terrorism. The Iraqi government must activate the role of the Iraqi Air Force rapidly, because this will serve the on-land military forces in the event of any incident. The Air Force can be summoned to intervene for the purpose of prosecuting terrorists or dealing with the situation at the checkpoints or the headquarters of the army in remote areas that are difficult to access. In such cases, the Air Force is much faster to prosecute terrorists, in the event that they get into a densely populated area, or the like. These steps will surely make the Iraqi security forces, the army and the police, ready to confront the dangers surrounding Iraq from all sides and to face terrorism, which wants Iraq to fall into the abyss of a sectarian war, to deny terrorism such an opportunity.
مصطفى علي عباس
2010-8-16
The Iraqi security forces are not completely ready for the U.S. friendly troops’ withdrawal from Iraq, because they need more training and participation in training, which allows them to be Iraq’s bastion against terrorism and the terrorist Al Qaeda. Indeed, some of the Iraqi security officials lack the skills of security men, as some of them are illiterate, and literacy is the most important quality of a security man in Iraq, mainly with the spread of this problem. Many among them also do not perform their duties appropriately, because the Iraqi security forces are not built on the basis of military discipline, which characterizes all the security services and the armies in the world. As a matter of fact, all these issues must be remedied quickly, before the friendly U.S. troops’ withdrawal in 2011, and the Iraqi government must rehabilitate its security forces, because they have been infiltrated and include many dishonest soldiers. Thus, the government must hold people accountable for breaking or violating law and order, as there are many sectarians among the security forces who carry out sectarian acts against Iraqi society and the sects that are present in Iraq. On the other hand, there are some soldiers who are committed in the right way. That’s why the Iraqi government must hold some persons accountable for abusing the order and damaging the reputation of the government and the security forces. The government must work on equipping the security forces, so that they can fill the security vacuum that the friendly U.S troops will leave after their withdrawal. It must also remedy the negative matters that have happened and must equip the Iraqi armed forces with air weapons, helicopters and warships, in order to prevent any security transgression, or to respond quickly if terrorists emerge in the streets.
مثنى
2010-8-16
Many Iraqi citizens suffer from many problems in their relations with the Iraqi armed forces and the Iraqi army. Iraqi citizens are suffering from the Iraqi army, as their relationship is based on sectarianism and discrimination. In addition, the Ministry of Justice is not interested in its troops’ awareness and educating them on the way they should treat Iraqis. Troops must be informed in fields like human rights, so that they will deal appropriately with citizens who are subjected to many abuses at the checkpoints and on the streets. For instance, the Iraqi government must work on making the soldiers and national forces aware, because they are basing their work on sectarianism, ethnicity and blocs. Besides, the Iraqi Ministry of Defense must take care of the fighters and provide them with military equipment that serves the Iraqi soldiers’ interests. For these reasons, everyone must take an interest in the performance of the Iraqi Ministry of Defense. The latter must serve the interests of the community rather than personal interests.
بندر العتيبي
2010-8-15
The Iraqi Ministry of Defense should make greater efforts in order to prevent security breaches that occur as a result of the security and military leaders’ slackness, and their lack of persistence in performing their duties in an appropriate way. I think that the main reason behind these security breaches, which claim the lives of many Iraqis, is not adopting the competence and ability principles from the Ministry officials. They resort to nepotism and intervention. Thus, they hire incompetent people who lack a sense of security and the military ability to plan and execute the duties assigned to them. I think that the weakness in the personality of the Minister of Defense has a significant role in the weakness of his ministry. As the famous Iraqi military saying goes, “We can judge the troops by their leader.” As a matter of fact, if the leader is weak, his weakness will contaminate all the members of his unit, and vice versa. So I believe that the best solution is selecting a powerful and experienced Defense Minister, in order to avoid weakness in coordinating and carrying out duties, and to avoid the imposition of military leaders from significant men in the government. This will affect the military service, making it weak, and resulting with many repercussions. Ordinary people will suffer as they fall prey to the continuous terrorist operations that are occurring despite the presence of checkpoints, given the weakness of the field leaders and their slowness in taking decisive measures in hard times, because the prerogatives were not given to the field leaders to make prompt decisions. Thus, we think that issuing any order takes a long time, as it goes through long and routine administrative procedures. This will weaken the military forces and make them unable to face the current challenges, and will lead to a poor military performance, the repercussions of which would be borne by the Iraqi people.
يحيى نايف كمر
2010-8-11
The Iraqi government’s security forces are sufficiently ready to assume full responsibility, to control the security situation and to maintain safety, especially given that the forces have adapted to the situation in the country and become accustomed to the new risks, in addition to knowing all the methods and plans that the terrorists use in targeting the innocent people, the state services or the infrastructure of the country, as well as targeting the elements of the security forces, police stations and checkpoints. If the Iraqi forces take care of the targeted locations and devise a plan to protect them against the terrorist acts and to provide them with security, these forces will be ready to take control over the situation in Iraq, and withdrawal or staying of the U.S. forces will not be of great importance in such a case. Indeed, the U.S. forces provide support and back the Iraqi security forces’ in more than one occasion, particularly during the carrying out of major operations and strikes against al-Qaeda and its leaders. This makes us think that we still need the U.S. troops in Iraq, only to get rid of terrorism, and to make use of the technical information and experiences of the U.S. intelligence. That is because the exchange of information between the Iraqi leaders and the U.S. military serves both sides. The Iraqi forces will be ready to control the situation and prevent the terrorists from carrying out any attacks or moving as they wish, because this is unacceptable, in addition to the large-scale cooperation that has started between the citizens and the security forces, and their strong confidence in each other.
2010-8-10
The Iranian regime is behind many of the problems in Iraq, and it has become necessary for for the government to act and perform its duties. This is what the citizens demand, to stabilize Iraq by severing relations with Iran and by stopping all trade exchanges with it, in addition to closing the border with Iran, hoping that its regime will come back to its senses and realize that what it is going on in Iraq is wrong and cannot be forgiven. Iraq and the Iraqi government have tolerated many positions and acts from this backward regime and its continued interference in Iraqi affairs. If stability in Iraq, as believed by many Iraqis, depends on the severance of relations with the Iranians, and if this will help Iraq get back to normal, then this is acceptable, because since the restoration of the Iranian-Iraqi relations and the opening of the borders between the two countries, it has never had any stability.
لا للانسحاب
2010-8-10
May God support Iraq after the withdrawal of the American forces! There is no doubt that a sectarian war will erupt. Iran will support Muqtada Al Sadr to establish another Hezbollah in Iraq.
2010-8-9
I think that the meaning of readiness depends on the size of the challenge that may face the Iraqi forces in the future, after the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. The terrorist threats and all the challenges that may arise in Iraq are under control and within the abilities of the Iraqi forces, as proved on the ground since they have taken over the security task from U.S. forces. Since then, the security forces have confronted terrorism and all acts that undermine the security and internal stability with power and without assistance from the U.S. forces. This means that the Iraqi forces have become powerful and ready enough to face these challenges. As for my opinion regarding the external challenges that may face Iraq after the withdrawal of the U.S. troops, I see that the situation is different, because the Iraqi forces have not reached the degree of readiness that would enable them to repel any external aggression against Iraq, because those troops do not have adequate weapons to fight off any external aggression. That is because most of Iraqi army’s weapons are currently light or medium weapons; so, I think that the Iraqi government and U.S. should take this problem into consideration, especially that Iraq has many enemies, especially the neighboring countries that do not welcome the democratic change in Iraq and want to take Iraq back to dictatorship, for fear that democracy in Iraq will encourage the peoples of those countries to demand change and call for democracy as well, as is the case now in Iraq. Iran, the neighbor to the east of Iraq, is the best example of these countries, and it has been assaulting Iraq continually, since the fall of Saddam's dirty regime until today, in every hostile way. This includes its support for militias and terrorism, providing them with weapons and explosives as well as money, and even smuggling illegal drugs into Iraq. Iran also tries to spread drugs among the Iraqis, and it has shelled border towns and villages in Kurdistan many times with artillery, and has occupied some border areas in Iraq, as happened with the Fakkah Well and other borderline regions.
شهاب
2010-8-7
By God, the Iraqi government should work on increasing the ability of Iraqi forces and their readiness through the fast conclusion of the arms deals and providing them to the Iraqis as soon as possible. The weapons should be imported from the best international sources. The Iraqi army must be provided with tanks and modern tankers as well as the advanced aircraft and all other heavy weapons the Iraqi army needs today. That is because without such arms the Iraqi forces will not be able to face external challenges. The U.S. side has retire from Iraq responsibly and after providing those requirements to the Iraqi forces as quickly as possible to avoid any attack on Iraq in the future, after the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.